![]() ![]() We can debate skill all we want, but the entertainment value of a more physical brand of basketball was next level. That era was objectively better to watch. and Mike Greenberg on at least one thing, though. Fitness continues to improve along with our diets that’ll lead to plenty more juicy debates comparing eras like this one. Would we all like to see a middle ground that allows some of today’s players to get thrown to the ground? Yes, but at the same time we also must recognize players don’t just get worse as the years march on. Nothing wrong with that, but it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. It became a league of more slender and accurate players. Less physical basketball that wasn’t embraced by old school fans of basketball. The commissioners wanted to govern the physicality to maximize player health and the league reacted to that change with more skill - increased ability to shoot from three, positions 1-5 can now handle the ball and analytics told players that taking two-pointers was a bad shot. Old heads are getting mad because no one is standing up to Draymond the way players of the past likely would have.īut in general, JJ Redick knows the facts of how the game is played today and how or why it changed. This conversation stems from the recent debate between Draymond Green and NBA old heads implying the Warriors star would get “knocked to the floor back in the day.” They’re saying this because Green is essentially playing bully ball during the finals thus far and it’s upsetting everyone. How can anyone debate otherwise? Implying the game was far more physical serves as a reminder of how much the game changed for the worse. He’s accurate when he says old heads describing previous eras as “physical” are disrespecting today’s athletes. We’ll start with JJ Redick because he’s clearly the most fired up of the three. That said, Redick had no problem disrespecting prior eras in support of the present, yet he can’t handle the same treatment when it happens to him.Īll that said, JJ Redick is a bright spot for the network and that’s proven true with his wildly successful podcast “The Old Man And The Three.” He questioned the greatness of Bob Cousy by calling his competition a bunch of “plumbers and fireman.” We see his point that competition, in theory, should only improve meaning the competition should have been at its worst when Cousy played. That’s up for debate, though.Īnd before we can move on to who was right, we have to acknowledge one thing Redick said earlier this year. And then lastly, JJ Redick that believes romanticizing our child hood heroes of the NBA is happening at the expense of present day players. Smith highlights the physicality of old school hoops and tries to back pedal on discounting today’s players. ![]() Mike Greenberg believes the 80’s and 90’s were better eras of the NBA and that today’s players are soft, and then you have Stephen A., who is somewhere in between. We actually have three sides to this argument, believe it or not. It’s silly, and more importantly, incorrect Nothing is worse than the discount of present day players romanticizing about the past. Smith made a point earlier that new school players weren’t physical like the players back in the day - that didn’t sit well with Redick - at all.Īnd understandably so as JJ Redick just retired after 15 seasons in the league. Smith and JJ Redick this morning on Mike Greenberg’s ‘Get Up’ was so captivating. ESPN has gotten all too comfortable with pretend debates where two parties pick a side and it comes across as unauthentic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |